Óû§Ãû: ÃÜÂë: ÑéÖ¤Âë:    ×¢²á | Íü¼ÇÃÜÂë?
Ê×Ò³|ÌýÁ¦×ÊÔ´|ÿÈÕÌýÁ¦|ÍøÂçµç̨|ÔÚÏߴʵä|ÌýÁ¦ÂÛ̳|ÏÂÔØÆµµÀ|²¿Âä¼ÒÔ°|ÔÚÏß±³µ¥´Ê|Ë«ÓïÔĶÁ|ÔÚÏßÌýд|ÆÕÌØÍøÐ£
ÄúµÄλÖãºÖ÷Ò³ > ÿÈÕ½¹µã > Éç»á >

Â×¶Ø´óÒøÐÐÄâ¾Í½±½ðÉÏÏÞÆðËßÅ·ÃË

2013-03-05    À´Ô´:FT    ¡¾´ó ÖРС¡¿      ÃÀ¹úÍâ½Ì ÔÚÏß¿ÚÓïÅàѵ

Banks look at suing EU on bonus cap 

The City of London’s big banks are considering suing the EU over rules to cap bonuses after receiving legal advice that the pay regulation could be struck down in court. 

Â׶ؽðÈÚ³Ç(City of London)µÄ´óÐÍÒøÐÐÕý¿¼ÂǾÍÉ趨½±½ðÉÏÏ޵Ĺ涨ÆðËßÅ·ÃË(EU)£¬´Ëǰ£¬ËüÃÇÊÕµ½·¨Âɽ¨Ò飬Õâһн×ʹ涨¿ÉÒÔÔÚ·¨Í¥Éϱ»ÍÆ·­¡£

The drastic options being weighed up by bankers underline industry anxiety over a fixed ratio pegging bonuses to salary, which will be debated by EU finance ministers in Brussels today.

ÒøÐмÒÕýÔÚ¿¼ÂǵÄÕâÒ»¼¤ÁÒÑ¡Ôñ£¬Í»ÏÔ³ö¸ÃÐÐÒµ¶Ô½±½ðÓëн×ʵĹ̶¨±ÈÂʸе½µ£ÓÇ£¬½ñÈÕÔÚ²¼Â³Èû¶ûÕÙ¿ªµÄÅ·Ã˲Ƴ¤»áÒ齫¾Í´Ë½øÐбçÂÛ¡£

George Osborne, UK chancellor, is planning to fight a rearguard action to revise the terms of the cap but diplomats are doubtful Britain will secure big changes at such a late stage. The stark odds against Mr Osborne are prompting banks to consider other radical steps, including suing.

Ó¢¹ú²ÆÕþ´ó³¼ÇÇÖΕ°Â˹±¾(George Osborne)¼Æ»®·¢Æð·ÀÎÀÐж¯£¬ÒÔÐ޸Ľ±½ðÉÏÏ޹涨£¬µ«Íâ½»ÈËÊ¿¶ÔÓÚÓ¢¹úÔÚÈç´ËÍíµÄ½×¶ÎʵÏÖÖØ´óÐ޸ĵÄÄÜÁ¦±íʾÖÊÒÉ¡£°Â˹±¾³É¹¦µÄ¿ÉÄÜÐÔºÜС£¬ÕâÕý´ÙÊ¹ÒøÐп¼ÂÇÆäËû¼¤½ø´ëÊ©£¬°üÀ¨ËßËÏ¡£

Legal advice for one bank, seen by the Financial Times, argues that the proposed ban on bonuses that exceed salary “contravenes European law” because of an EU treaty provision that prohibits regulating pay in member states. But it remains unclear whether banks would brave a high-profile court challenge given the potential public backlash.

Ó¢¹ú¡¶½ðÈÚʱ±¨¡·¿´µ½µÄÒ»ÏîΪһ¼ÒÒøÐÐÌṩµÄ·¨Âɽ¨ÒéÖ÷ÕÅ£¬ÄâÒéµÄ¶ÔÊý¶î³¬¹ýн×ʵĽ±½ðµÄÏÞÖÆ“Î¥·´Å·ÃË·¨ÂÉ”£¬ÒòΪһÏîÅ·ÃËÌõÔ¼Ìõ¿î½ûÖ¹¹Ü¿ØÅ·Ã˳ÉÔ±¹úµÄн×Ê¡£µ«Ä¿Ç°Éв»Çå³þ£¬¼øÓÚ¿ÉÄܵĹ«ÖÚ¿¹Òé£¬ÒøÐÐÊÇ·ñ¸ÒÓÚ·¢Æð¸ßµ÷µÄ·¨ÂÉËßËÏ¡£

The confidential advice from law firm Shearman and Sterling concludes: “A mandatory provision fixing the maximum salary-bonus ratio payable in the banking sector . . . contravenes European law.” 

À´×Ôл¶ûÂü•Ë¼ÌØÁéÂÉʦÊÂÎñËù(Shearman and Sterling)µÄ±£Ãܽ¨Òé×Ü½á³Æ£º“ÉèÖÃÒøÐÐҵн×ÊÓë½±½ðÖ®¼ä±ÈÂÊÉÏÏÞµÄÇ¿ÖÆÐԹ涨……Î¥·´Å·ÃË·¨ÂÉ¡£” 

No formal EU legal advice on the issue is public. But the European parliament and Brussels argue the objections of the banks are not relevant, as the bonus ratio does not regulate total pay and is justified as a prudential financial measure, rather than as social policy.

ÓйظÃÎÊÌâµÄÕýʽŷÃË·¨Âɽ¨Ò鶼ûÓй«¿ª¡£µ«Å·ÖÞÒé»á(European parliament)ºÍÅ·ÃË±ç³Æ£¬ÒøÐеķ´¶ÔÎ޹ؽôÒª£¬ÒòΪ½±½ð±ÈÂÊûÓйܿØ×Üн³ê£¬ÊÇÒ»ÏîºÏÀíÉóÉ÷µÄ½ðÈھٴ룬¶ø·ÇÉç»áÕþ²ß¡£ 

“We are confident this proposal is absolutely legally sound,” the European Commission said. “Excessive bonuses [at banks] led to excessive risk and taxpayers having to step in. That explains why prudential regulation is needed.” 

“ÎÒÃÇÏàÐÅ£¬ÕâÒ»Ìá°¸¾ø¶Ô¾ßÓз¨ÂÉÒÀ¾Ý£¬”Å·ÃËίԱ»á(European Commission)±íʾ£¬“£¨ÒøÐе쩹ý¶à½±½ðµ¼ÖÂÁ˹ý¶È·çÏÕ£¬ÄÉ˰È˲»µÃ²»½éÈëÆäÖС£Õâ¾ÍÊÇΪºÎÐèÒªÉóÉ÷¼à¹ÜµÄÔ­Òò¡£”

£¨À´Ô´£ºFT£©



¶¥Ò»ÏÂ
(1)
100%
²ÈÒ»ÏÂ
(0)
0%
ÊÖ»úÉÏÆÕÌØ m.putclub.com ÊÖ»úÉÏÆÕÌØ
[ÔðÈα༭£ºluoxh]
------·Ö¸ôÏß----------------------------
Ïà¹ØÎÄÕÂÁбí
·¢±íÆÀÂÛ ²é¿´ËùÓÐÆÀÂÛ
Çë×Ô¾õ×ñÊØ»¥ÁªÍøÕþ²ß·¨¹æ£¬ÑϽû·¢²¼É«Çé¡¢±©Á¦¡¢·´¶¯µÄÑÔÂÛ¡£
ÆÀ¼Û:
񡀂:
Óû§Ãû: ÃÜÂë: ÑéÖ¤Âë:
  • ÍÆ¼öÎÄÕÂ
  • ×ÊÁÏÏÂÔØ
  • ½²×ù¼Òô
ÆÕÌØÓ¢ÓïÊÖ»úÍøÕ¾
ÓÃÊÖ»úä¯ÀÀÆ÷ÊäÈëm.putclub.com½øÈëÆÕÌØÊÖ»úÍøÕ¾Ñ§Ï°
²é¿´¸ü¶àÊÖ»úѧϰAPP>>