用户名: 密码: 验证码:    注册 | 忘记密码?
首页|听力资源|每日听力|网络电台|在线词典|听力论坛|下载频道|部落家园|在线背单词|双语阅读|在线听写|普特网校
您的位置:主页 > 每日焦点 > 社会 >

欧盟新规:上下班路上花费的时间也算工作时间

2015-09-14    来源:网络    【      美国外教 在线口语培训

Travelling to work 'is work', European court rules
欧盟新规:上下班路上花费的时间也算工作时间

欧盟最高法院近日宣布了一条新规定,员工在赶往不同上班地点、下班回家时所花费的时间都要计入工作范畴,并付以相应的报酬。

举例来说,如果一个水管工早上花了2个小时才到达第一个工作地点,那么这2个小时都要计入当日劳动,赶往第二个工作地点的时间也算,回程也同理。但是,此项新规并不适用于那些往来于同一办公地的普通白领工作者。

Time spent travelling to and from first and last appointments by workers without a fixed office should be regarded as working time, the European Court of Justice has ruled.

This time has not previously been considered as work by many employers.

It means firms including those employing care workers, gas fitters and sales reps may be in breach of EU working time regulations.

BBC legal correspondent Clive Coleman said it could have a "huge effect".

"Employers may have to organise work schedules to ensure workers' first and last appointments are close to their homes," he added.

'Health and safety'

Chris Tutton, from the solicitors Irwin Mitchell, told the BBC: "Thousands of employers may now potentially be in breach of working time regulation rules in the UK."

The court said its judgement was about protecting the "health and safety" of workers as set out in the European Union's working time directive.

The directive is designed to protect workers from exploitation by employers, and it lays down regulations on matters such as how long employees work, how many breaks they have, and how much holiday they are entitled to.

One of its main goals is to ensure that no employee in the EU is obliged to work more than an average of 48 hours a week.

The ruling came about because of an ongoing legal case in Spain involving a company called Tyco, which installs security systems.

'Bear the burden'

The company shut its regional offices down in 2011, resulting in employees travelling varying distances before arriving at their first appointment.

The court ruling said: "The fact that the workers begin and finish the journeys at their homes stems directly from the decision of their employer to abolish the regional offices and not from the desire of the workers themselves.

"Requiring them to bear the burden of their employer's choice would be contrary to the objective of protecting the safety and health of workers pursued by the directive, which includes the necessity of guaranteeing workers a minimum rest period."

Meanwhile, employment law barrister Caspar Glyn agreed the court's decision could affect "millions of workers".

However, Mr Glyn also said there had been much speculation that this ruling could allow workers on the national minimum wage to claim more money for the time they spend getting to work.

But he said this would not be the case.

"The national minimum wage is a UK right, it is not a European right. There's no European right to a national minimum wage.

"The minimum wage regulations in the UK do not count as work travel from home or to any workplace," he said.

gas fitter:煤气工匠

sales rep:销售代表



顶一下
(0)
0%
踩一下
(0)
0%
手机上普特 m.putclub.com 手机上普特
[责任编辑:katee]
------分隔线----------------------------
发表评论 查看所有评论
请自觉遵守互联网政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
用户名: 密码: 验证码:
  • 推荐文章
  • 资料下载
  • 讲座录音
普特英语手机网站
用手机浏览器输入m.putclub.com进入普特手机网站学习
查看更多手机学习APP>>